Looming
Wine
Our
valley's wine industry is about to boom. Can we guide it? BY
LANCE SPARKS
EDITOR'S
NOTE: Back in our July 22, 1999 issue, Lance Sparks wrote a cover
story on "Wine Country," predicting a boom in local vineyards. This
story is an update.
It's a nearly perfect late-summer morning in Oregon's
vineyards, from Hood River and the Columbia Valley in the north,
to the verdant hills around Dundee, through the Willamette Valley,
the Umpqua, the Rogue. Last night was cool. The day dawned clear
and still, temperatures ratcheting rapidly upward toward the 90s,
taking sugar levels in grapes toward those magical numbers (measured
as brix) that will signal the rush to harvest and crush this year's
vintage — another, we hope, in a string of successful vintages
stretching back into the mid-1990s.
A
worker prunes vines at Sweet Cheeks Vineyard
Frost
fans at King Estate
Sweet
Cheeks' Chardonnay grapes
Wine looms large in Oregon's future, and in the
future of the south Willamette Valley, especially in the small communities
— Veneta, Elmira, Monroe, Junction City — that border
the foothills of the Coast Range. Wine and wine tourism and businesses
related to both will feel the impact of thousands of visitors seeking
the best of this area's fine wines, especially pinot noir and pinot
gris. The impacts are already being felt on the wine-touring routes
that weave through the valleys and towns along Territorial Road
and its byways.
Ric Ingham, Veneta's city manager, says, "In the
city of Veneta, we talk about it all the time. We want to have our
own healthy, vibrant economy." Ingham adds, "We view wine tourism
as hugely important."
King Estate, the area's largest wine producer with
a thousand acres planted, last year hosted more than 10,000 visitors
in its tasting rooms and restaurant (interestingly, about half of
them locals, according to Sasha Kadey, King's marketing manager),
and King Estate expects that number to increase yearly for the foreseeable
future.
Those numbers might seem dramatic here, but in the
north end of the valley, one major winery, Sokol-Blosser, reports
as many as 900 visitors in a day during the high season.
Lane County Commissioner Pete Sorenson, whose district
is "where the consumers live," considers this potential "phenomenal
for the people of Oregon" and calls it a "tremendous economic engine."
Lane County Commissioner Bill Fleenor, whose district encompasses
core wineries in our area, enthuses, "I think it's great." Wine
tourism, Fleenor adds, is "a nice, clean industry that we should
be promoting." And we are promoting it: Lisa Lawton, representing
the Convention & Visitors Association of Lane County (CVALCO),
reports, "Wineries were the second most requested category of interest
from visitors to Lane County during this past fiscal year. This
is the first time we've seen requests rise to this level. The popularity
of wine tasting and touring in our area is really growing as local
and statewide marketing efforts continue to increase exposure for
Oregon's wine industry." As next summer's Olympic Trials approach,
CVALCO and other touring associations are placing ads in prominent
magazines and Web sites, emphasizing wine tours among other activities.
The area expects to draw "13,000 spectators, 1,000 athletes and
officials, and 1,000 media representatives," touts the ads.
That many people eager to taste wines might be equally
eager to fill their experience — and their shopping carts
— with other products and services. Wine is obviously an agricultural
product, but it is also a cultural product. The connection between
love of fine wine and fervor for fine dining is old and celebrated;
those wine lovers will want to eat good local cuisine. They'll be
looking for charming places to rest their heads and bodies after
days of tasting and touring. Inevitably, this must spur growth in
construction of hotels, motels, B&Bs and spas, and all of these
will have to be serviced with utilities, such as water, electricity,
gas, sewers and roads. Clearly, the positive economic impact could
be significant: new jobs to replace losses due to declining timber
harvests; new customers for small businesses, craftspeople, farmers
and artisans in the wine corridor; new demand for housing, with
a corresponding rise in property values.
This prospect raises — or should raise —
vital questions about the future of our valley, how the citizens
of this area want it to grow, how and who will pay for the infrastructure
adaptations that such growth will demand, and a host of others.
Could our heretofore quiet valley become Napacized? Would that be
a good thing, or could we end by being well and truly Californicated?
We've seen this before, in Napa Valley itself (and
other California wine valleys in Sonoma, Mendocino, around cities
like Monterey and Santa Barbara) and in our own hills and valleys
in Polk and Yamhill Counties. In fact, the Napa experience could
provide some guidance for our planners — and some cautions.
In the 1960s, Napa Valley — 35 miles long,
5 miles wide — was home to a wine industry known for decent
but not exceptional wines, particularly cabernet sauvignon and chardonnay.
Average price for a vineyard acre stood around $2,000. Ten years
later, the average price per acre had jumped to $5,000. When, in
1976, a Stag's Leap (Napa) cabernet outshone some of the greatest
French Bordeaux in a Paris tasting, Napa wines leapt on to the world
wine stage. By 1980, price per acre had rocketed up 500 percent,
to $41,500. Today, the Napa Valley is home to more than 400 wineries
doing more than $1 billion in sales and drawing five million visitors
a year. The visitors come on bicycles and motorcycles, in cars,
RVs, buses, limos, even horse-drawn buggies. They fly over in hot-air
balloons. There's even a special Napa Wine Train. Impact: According
to Bergman Euro-National, Napa Realtors, the projected average price
per acre for 2010 is $180,000.
Interestingly, the string of small towns along Hwy.
29 from Napa city to Calistoga — towns like Yountville, Oakville,
St. Helena — retain their small-town character and feel, and
visitors notice the absence of fast-food restaurants and garish
signage. This is largely because, before the boom, owners of the
wineries, particularly following the leadership of Robert Mondavi,
joined with other business owners, responsible city and county political
figures and local citizens to enact regulations that had two aims:
Reserve vineyard lands and control development. Now, instead of
fast-food joints, the towns boast some of the country's finest restaurants
and, instead of cheap motels, luxury accommodations to rival the
world's best.
The economic upsides seem obvious. There are downsides:
Working-class people don't dine at French Laundry or Bouchon or
take rooms at Calistoga Ranch. One wine professional described Yountville
as having become "a ghetto of the rich." Is there something we can
learn for the future of Oregon wine country development? Does Oregon
have anything like Napa potential? Actually, the recent history
of growth in Oregon wine follows some interesting parallels, with
notable differences.
For many Oregonians, it still comes as some surprise
that Oregon wines are so well-admired as to draw thousands of visitors
to our vineyards and tasting rooms. Last year, though, the highly
regarded and widely read Wine Spectator listed seven Oregon
wines among their yearly Top 100 of the world (note that there are
more than 5,000 wines released yearly). This year, the annual (since
1986) Oregon Pinot Noir Celebration drew 900 guests to its three-day
event in McMinnville — to which tickets cost almost $800 each
— attracting visitors and winemakers from all over the world,
many coming to sample and talk about the state's (arguably) best
wine, pinot noir. In fact, growth of the Oregon wine industry has
been rapid and shows few signs of slowing.
The numbers and history are revealing: Before 1960,
Oregon wine, in the post-Prohibition era, was largely restricted
to fruit wines, some quite good but not vinifera grape-based. In
1962, Richard Sommer planted Riesling at his HillCrest Vineyards
in the Umpqua Valley. In 1966, David Lett, of Eyrie Vineyards, pioneered
in the north part of the Willamette Valley, planting pinot noir
on his Dundee site. Their success led to remarkable growth. A Wikipedia
entry traces the pace of that growth: By 1970, we had five bonded
wineries and 35 acres in production; by 1980, we had 34 wineries,
115 growers, 1,100 productive acres; 1990 saw 70 wineries, 320 growers,
5,682 acres; 2000, 135 wineries, 500 growers, 10,500 acres; 2005,
314 wineries, 519 growers, 13,700 acres. According to figures from
the Oregon Wine Board, this year Oregon has "350 wineries and nearly
400 wine brands."
Twenty years ago, vineyard property might have cost
$1,800 an acre; today, according to Mike McLain, whose McLain Associates
are the state's most active vineyard real estate agents, "Prices
range from $8,000 in the west mid-valley to as high as $40,000 on
the Dundee Hill, per plantable, ready-to-plant acre."
Most of the dramatic growth has been concentrated
in Polk/Yamhill, but the south end of the Willamette Valley has
also grown from two wineries in the early 1980s to 14 today, stretching
from Monroe to Cottage Grove. Most are concentrated on the Territorial
ribbon from Elmira/Veneta to Lorane, including the flagship King
Estate (where, incidentally, participants at the Oregon Planning
Institute Conference could choose to take a tour to taste top-shelf
wines and explore the facilities). In terms of planted acreage,
Lane County lags behind Polk/Yamhill (1,000 acres to more than 7,000).
"But," McLain notes, "as the valley develops and land becomes more
expensive up north, more and more growers will begin looking south.
And even east. Mohawk Valley, McKenzie Valley, Cottage Grove, anywhere
it won't frost and there's adequate heat … 200,000ish acres
suited on the west of the valley from end to end … Cottage
Grove to Forest Grove."
Do those figures presage a Napa-like future for
our region? "Never going to happen," says Bill Nelson, president
of WineAmerica (National Association of American Wineries). Nelson
is now based in Washington, D.C., but for years he was head of Oregon's
Wine Advisory Board. He intimately knows the people and the wines
of this area and stays in close touch. "You're not going to see
something that structurally changes the area," Nelson argues. "You're
always going to have a mixture of lifestyles," so towns like Elmira,
Veneta and Junction City will have their fast-food places for working-class
people side by side with new upscale restaurants for well-to-do
wine tourists. In part, Nelson thinks, Oregon can never be Napacized
simply because we're not Napa-sized; "You don't have 20 million
people wanting to visit."
Nelson does have some concerns about the impact
of Measure 37 on the preservation of vineyard lands, simply because
"wine land could get priced out by developers" when people want
to build "on hillsides with nice views," precisely the kind of property
best suited for vineyards. Even if vineyard land is going for $40,000
an acre, "no way vineyard [owners] can fight off the houses" with
land going at $25,000 for a quarter-acre. Suddenly, after Measure
37, "there's almost no protection."
Some other shadows have appeared on the sunny landscape
of prosperity generated by all this new business and activity. Right
now, Territorial Road, the main artery traversing most of the area's
major vineyards and wineries, is a narrow two-lane blacktop with,
in some places, notable problems in road slumping and rough surfaces.
The road also carries farm equipment, log trucks and commuting residents.
How much longer can it continue in its present condition? How long
can we delay action before a poor surface and too much traffic result
in tragic consequences?
Wine is good agriculture; in fact, many of Oregon's
grape-growers have led the way in the thinking about organic, sustainable
farming. King Estate's owners, for example, have converted their
1,000 acres to organic growing, meeting the strict certification
standards of Oregon Tilth. Wine producing is also good business
for Oregon. According to Oregon Wine Board figures, the total economic
impact of the wine industry yielded, in 2006, $1.2 billion, with
$203 million going to direct wages and another $370.8 million going
to retailers and restaurants. Tourism produced revenues of $92.2
million, with the state receiving tax revenues of $41.6 million.
Members of the Oregon wine industry also generously donated $3.03
million to charities. And the future of Oregon wine? In 2006, a
record 1,378 new acres were planted in grapes.
As Commissioner Sorenson noted, that's an "economic
engine" with considerable power. So would residents of this region
and the growers be best served by keeping hands off the wheel and
letting laissez-faire forces drive the vehicle into the future?
Or should there be some concerted effort by all the stakeholders
to take charge of the process and direction? Commissioner Fleenor
expresses a wish for what he calls "visioning," for vineyard owners
to "put together some plans that we can help them execute." Sorenson
seeks "incentives" to create an "open landscape" without which "you're
going to look like anywhere else," instead of like the Oregon that
drew so many of us to living here.
Today, at the end of another nearly perfect day,
the Lorane Valley's vineyards look lovely, darkening fruit hanging
on the vines promising a sweet harvest and a bright future. We can
only hope that all this beauty will be tended with foresight and
prudence — because what we put in the glass is what we'll
drink.