
News Briefs: Examining Fair Trade | Spencer's
Butte Gets Rehab | Injunction Favors Watada
| Denying Genocide? | War Dead
| Early Deadlines |
Slant: Short opinion pieces
and rumor-chasing notes
News:
Predator
Poison
DeFazio plans to ban deadly toxins
Happening People: Lynn
and Ken Schilling
EXAMINING
FAIR TRADE
Can the fair trade movement have a significant impact
on how products are grown, marketed and sold around the world?
Organic coffee available in the U.S. during the
1980s was not too tasty, so the Eugene-based coffee company Café
Mam was created in 1985 to export coffee from a farmers' cooperative
in Chiapas, Mexico, said Brad Lerch, who co-owns Café Mam with
his uncle dahinda meda and cousin John Lerch. Their first lesson
in fair trade, a movement seeking more equitable pay for workers
in developing countries, came a few years later, when they had to
pay more to compete with the cooperative's European customers, Lerch
explained at a UO panel discussion on fair trade Nov. 1.
"Europe is about 10 years ahead of the U.S. on fair
trade," Lerch said.
Café Mam chose to undergo the costly process
of applying for fair trade certification in the mid-1990s after
the business had grown to the point that the owners no longer knew
all their customers, Lerch said. The company has continued to work
with the same cooperative in Chiapas and visits the farmers regularly.
"Dealing with one specific group has allowed us
to make more of an impact," Lerch said, adding that the daughter
of one of the farmers he works with is now the first member of her
family to attend a university.
UO economics professor Bruce Blonigen said the main
goals of fair trade are to improve the salary and working conditions
of workers in developing countries and to ensure environmentally
friendly business practices in developing countries. He sees its
advantages as helping poorer farmers control their participation
in the market and making the trade process more efficient by removing
the middleman.
But the underlying problem in international trade,
Blonigen said, is that living and working conditions in developing
countries are so bad that people will work for multinational corporations
at wages most in the U.S. would consider unfair. He questioned whether
fair trade could do enough to fix this problem.
Most fair trade products currently are specialty
items that make up a small portion of most people's budgets, such
as coffee, tea, cocoa, bananas and crafts, Blonigen said.
Coffee, as Lerch said, is the world's second largest
traded commodity after oil. Blonigen said that the demand for coffee,
like the demand for oil, tends to be inelastic, or not very vulnerable
to price fluctuations. Other items might not handle a 10 to 15 percent
premium charge as smoothly.
"I'm cynical about [fair trade's] ability to mainstream
across enough products that developing countries would take off
because of it," Blonigen said. "Let's face it, the average American
consumer drinks Folgers."
Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International,
which is based in Germany, reported that consumers worldwide spent
1.6 billion euros (approximately $2.3 billion) on fair trade-certified
products in 2006, a 41 percent increase from 2005. For comparison,
the World Trade Organization reported that world merchandise exports
totaled $11.76 trillion in 2006, so fair trade works out to about
0.02 percent of the world's total trade for 2006.
Two UO student organizations, the Sustainable Business
Group and the International Business and Economics Club, hosted
the event after Café Mam contacted them about doing something
for Fair Trade Month in October, said SBG President Binh Lu.
"A lot of people think sustainability is just the
environment, but it's not," Lu said, adding that she defines a sustainable
business as one that is consciously aware of its impact on the environment,
the community and the people it works with. — Eva Sylwester
SPENCER'S
BUTTE GETS REHAB
Don't be offended if next time you hike Spencer's
Butte you find some trails blocked off and a fence in place. The
Southeast Neighbors have teamed up with the city of Eugene to repair
deteriorated trails and flora near the top of the butte.
Southeast Neighbors received a matching grant from
the city to fix the butte, but they're worried other hikers may
mistake their butte-friendly project for the city getting in the
way of their right to hike. Local residents have been concerned
about erosion on the east side of the butte and dangerous hiking
conditions created by steep cut-through trails that deviate from
the switchbacks on the official trails.
Tom Halferty, a geologist and biologist who's a
member of Southeast Neighbors, says the project will involve transplanting
vegetation and placing downed logs across the problematic trails,
creating a natural barrier and allowing native plants to re-grow.
The groups also plans to install a 40 to 50 foot wooden fence and
signs to help decommission the trails. The fence may come down later
once the trails have blended back into the landscape.
The group welcomes more volunteers for their workday
on Spencer's Butte, which will take place at 10 am Saturday, Dec.
1. Volunteers will meet in the Spencer's Butte parking lot off Willamette
Street, and Halferty suggests being ready for "challenging physical
work on steep slopes." For more information, contact Halferty at
thomas_halferty@yahoo.com or 517-2646. — Camilla Mortensen
INJUNCTION
FAVORS WATADA
Army Lt. Ehren Watada this week got at least a temporary
reprieve from prosecution. Watada had refused to deploy to Iraq
to participate in what he said was an illegal war and was facing
a second court martial after his first trial earlier this year was
declared a mistrial. Watada's lawyers argued that the constitutional
prohibition against double jeopardy, or being tried twice for the
same crime, prevents him from being court-martialed again.
U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle agreed that
the lawyers' argument has merit and issued a preliminary injunction
halting any further court martial proceeding. According to a statement
from Judge Settle, "This case concerns an alleged violation of the
Fifth Amendment Double Jeopardy Clause, which cannot be said to
fall within a set of affairs that are peculiar to the jurisdiction
of the military authorities … The same Fifth Amendment protections
are in place for military service members as are afforded to civilians.
... To hold otherwise would ignore the many sacrifices that American
soldiers have made throughout history to protect those sacred rights."
Watada's attorneys described this injunction as
"an enormous victory," according to a statement from the family.
"But the case is not yet over and has not yet ripened into a permanent
injunction, though the judge did indicate that the attorneys have
demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits."
The judge's order did not indicate what the next
steps will be, but he stated that no trial proceedings could occur
until his further order or until this injunction is modified or
dissolved by him or by a higher court. For more complete information
and updates, visit www.thankyoult.org
DENYING
GENOCIDE?
When does legitimate criticism of Israeli policies
"cross the line" into anti-Semitism and denial of the Holocaust?
Three UO professors and a local rabbi spoke Nov.
8 at a campus symposium about Holocaust denial. More than 100 people
attended the event.
The Robert D. Clark Honors College, the Department
of History and the Schnitzer Family Program in Judaic Studies sponsored
the event. It was held in response to the Pacifica Forum's bringing
of Mark Weber, director of the Institute of Historical Review, to
speak on campus on Nov. 3.
The Institute of Historical Review said on its website
that it has "published detailed books and numerous probing essays
that call into question aspects of the orthodox Holocaust extermination
story and highlight specific Holocaust exaggerations and falsehoods."
Associate professor of history David Luebke said
at the symposium that even the Institute of Historical Review does
not deny that many Jewish people died in World War II and suffered
a great catastrophe. They are classified as Holocaust deniers, Luebke
explained, because they adhere to the following articles of faith:
1. There is no evidence the Nazis had a plan or
policy of exterminating Jewish people;
2. There is no evidence of homicidal gas chambers;
3. The figure and of six million Jewish deaths is
an exaggeration.
"They amount to a denial of all the things that
made the Holocaust a genocide," Luebke said.
In contrast, Luebke said, all professional historians
believe that the Nazis plotted to kill Jews, that they used gas
chambers in addition to other weapons to kill Jews and that six
million Jews were deliberately and systematically killed.
Luebke said historians debate other issues, such
as when the Nazis developed the intention to commit genocide, but
not whether there was intentional genocide. Even Nazi official Adolf
Eichmann didn't deny that genocide occurred — he only denied
that he was responsible for it.
"If the perpetrators of the Holocaust admit that
what they did was genocide, why should we not believe them?" Luebke
said.
Shaul Cohen, associate professor of geography, described
the story of Kristallnacht and the Holocaust as "something that
comes down to me through the remnants of my very truncated family."
Among other tragedies, one of his great-grandmothers died of typhus
in a concentration camp.
"I will not accept the explanation of Mark Weber
that her death was of natural causes," Cohen said.
Cohen said some Jewish people marginalize critics
of Israel by calling them all anti-Semitic.He said Weber similarly
lumps all Jewish people together, while in fact there is a wide
range of opinions within the Jewish community on the subject of
Israel.
Israel is a sovereign state recognized by the U.N.,
and Cohen said it is possible and necessary to be critical of any
state when its policies are problematic. Criticism of Israel only
becomes anti-Semitism when it turns into vilification of Jewish
people everywhere, he said, and noted that Holocaust deniers show
much more attention to the problems of Israel than they do to similar
problems in other sovereign states.
"They willfully, knowingly cross the line," he said.
The rabbi who spoke was Jonathan Seidel, who serves
at Or haGan, Light of the Garden Jewish Community in Eugene and
is an instructor in the UO Judaic Studies program. He also said
criticizing Israel does not always equal attacking the legitimacy
of Israel, and that while supporting Israel was considered a major
part of Jewish identity while he was growing up, that's not so much
the case now. He said it is still important for all people, Jewish
and otherwise, to learn about the Holocaust.
David Frank, a professor of rhetoric in the Honors
College, said he was concerned that debating Holocaust deniers might
give them undeserved legitimacy or cultivate the false idea that
there was a debate going on.
"Confronting Weber and the Pacifica Forum makes
me feel filthy and dirty," Frank said.
However, he said that while most people can recognize
crude anti-Semitism, sophisticated anti-Semitism such as that of
the Institute of Historical Review is easier for people to get sucked
into. — Eva Sylwester
WAR DEAD
Since the U.S. invasion of Iraq
began on March 20, 2003 (last week's numbers
in parentheses):
• 3,860 U.S. troops killed*
(3,849)
• 28,451 U.S. troops injured*
(28,171)
• 130 U.S. military suicides*
(128)
• 304 coalition troops killed**
(304)
• 933 contractors killed(accurate
updates NA)
• 83,541 Iraqi civilians killed***
(83,029)
• $468 billion cost of war
($466.1 billion)
• $133.1 million cost to Eugene
taxpayers ($132.5 million)
*
through Nov. 12, 2007; source: icasualties.org; some figures only
updated monthly
**
estimate; source: icasualties.org
***
highest estimate; source: iraqbodycount.org; based on confirmed
media reports; other groups calculate civilian deaths as high as
655,000 to one million
EARLY
DEADLINES
Due to the Thanksgiving holiday, EW will
publish a day earlier than usual, on Wednesday, Nov. 21. EW
offices will be closed Thursday and Friday. Early deadline for reserving
display ads for our Nov. 21 issue will be 5 pm Thursday, Nov. 15.
Classified deadline will also be early at 5 pm Friday, Nov. 16.
For the following week's issue, Nov. 29, the early deadline for
reserving display ad space will be 5 pm Wednesday, Nov. 21.
| SLANT
•
Eugene's Duck footballers deserve congratulations and caveats
for working their way up to a lofty #2 ranking in the
national polls. Most prior occupants of the #2 slot this season
have stumbled badly and faded out of contention for the national
championship. Rankings, fancy uniforms and ESPN hype are all
nice, but it boils down to making plays and winning games.
Let's hope the Ducks charge over the Wildcats, Bruins and
Beavers and right into the national championship game. That's
scheduled for Jan. 7 in New Orleans, for those of you already
penciling out your 2008 calendar.
•
Still thinking about the election? We imagine there's
still a bit of head scratching going on at City Hall and at
the R-G following the resounding defeat of the Eugene
urban renewal measure Nov. 6. Last week in this column we
wrote about people's lack of trust in city government. But
there's another related factor at work here. Both the city
government and our daily newspaper are painfully out of touch
with the people of our community.
Let's
start with the city staff and the council. Working on behalf
of the citizens last summer, they decided to charge ahead
with a big urban renewal expansion to subsidize redevelopment
downtown. Did the council and staff think the taxpayers wouldn't
notice or care about inflated options, historic buildings,
existing businesses, guaranteed profits for developers, parks
and open space or big subsidies for chain stores? Small business
owners and others revolted and started an initiative drive
that forced the city to put this $40 million gamble on the
ballot. We're seeing a pattern of disjointed, cart-before-the-horse
city actions. Some examples: The people want public money
spent on public amenities, not chain stores downtown, but
a park was only added to the redevelopment plan as an afterthought.
The city is spending $1 million-plus getting public input
into a new City Hall before even asking if people want
a new City Hall. The voters have twice turned down new police
facilities, but the city is going ahead and planning one,
and not downtown where we need redevelopment — and cops.
As for
the R-G, the fortress on the outskirts near Springfield
is isolated and out of touch with the people. Why else would
the editorial board consistently endorse second-rate candidates
and lost causes? You could say the R-G editorial board
is simply standing up for who and what they think is right,
but more likely their key sources for information in the community
are themselves out of touch. The Chamber of Commerce, for
example, has for years been disconnected from Eugene's small
business community. And the country club clique is out of
touch with working people who vote.
•
Speaking of the R-G, the daily paper lost at least
one subscriber this month due to its coverage of the urban
renewal fiasco. City Councilor Bonny Bettman canceled her
subscription Nov. 1 with a letter to the editorial board complaining
about what she calls "a new low in biased journalism." She
cites a series of unfair news stories and multiple editorials
and columns favoring the measure, with minimal input from
the opposition. "I have become accustomed to low standards
of local reporting by the R-G, and of course I never
expect them to agree or support a position that I have taken,"
she wrote. "But the bottom line here is that they have a responsibility,
as our only community daily paper, to provide balanced information
to the public. The R-G's posturing on this issue has
been extreme, and extremely manipulative. Apparently they
don't trust the voters to weigh relevant information and make
an informed choice. The paper has proven to be utterly biased
and uninformative on local issues. For regional, state and
national issues there are other newspapers." See the full
text of her letter at blogs.eugeneweekly.com
this week.
•
One item that might have escaped attention in recent stories
about the renegotiated city purchase options for the
Broadway project is that Jack Roberts, whose family owns the
Taco Time building, agreed to sell his building to the city
for nearly $83,000 less than its assessed market value
of $1.28 million. Connor & Woolley, on the other hand,
agreed to sell their Centre Court building and adjacent pit,
valued at $1.07 million, for $2.8 million. Find all the numbers
on Alan Pittman's
blog.
And where
do we go from here on downtown redevelopment? We hear
interim City Manager Angel Jones has been spending time in
Portland meeting with developers KWG and Beam, and a council
workshop has been set for Nov. 27, and a public hearing is
planned for Dec. 3. But we also hear that Jones has not received
any marching orders from the council on how to proceed following
the defeat of Measure 20-134. What's going on?
•
Apparently Huskies are less interested than Beavers in cutting
trees. OSU's College of Forestry has been undergoing
a "strategic realignment," and it appears that the powers
that be have decided that as part of the realignment, the
Department of Forest Resources might get the ax. That is the
one program that teaches forest policy and nature-based recreation
as opposed to simply growing and harvesting trees. OSU Forestry's
big competitor, the University of Washington, is going another
route: UW is planning to include forestry in its proposed
College of the Environment, "producing informed, environmentally
conscious citizens and leaders."
•
Norman Solomon is returning to Eugene this week (see
our News Briefs last week), and, as always, he provides us
plenty to ponder regarding American culture, media and our
addiction to violence as a foreign policy. He's talking at
1 pm Thursday, Nov. 15, in the Forum Building on the LCC campus
and will show his new documentary at 7 pm Thursday at the
UO Knight Law School, room 175. His talk after the film showing
will be broadcast live by KOPT 1600 AM.
SLANT
includes short opinion pieces, observations and rumor-chasing
notes compiled by the EW staff. Heard any good rumors lately?
Contact Ted Taylor at 484-0519, editor@eugeneweekly.com
|

LYNN
AND KEN SCHILLING
 |
Ever since his childhood in Nyssa, Ore., Ken Schilling
has had a special rapport with dogs. "I trained my first dog when
I was 7," he notes. Schilling joined the Army after seeing a recruiting
poster for the military dog detachment. "At first they sent me to
an artillery unit," he says. "I harassed them until I got transferred."
When he got out in 1976, Schilling trained at Madelyn Kennels in
Bakersfield, Calif., and then built a kennel in San Benito, Texas,
where he met his wife, Lynn. He studied curriculum design at Texas
A&M to develop a course for police officers working with dogs
for tracking and narcotics detection. In 1995, the Schillings moved
to Oregon and opened Schilling's Northwest Law Dogs in Eugene, offering
classes in obedience, personal protection and assistance for handicapped
people. In 2001, Lynn joined the business full-time to add daycare,
aka the K9 Social Club, to the menu. "Problem dogs have been my
specialty," says Ken, whose training method balances praise, reward,
and discipline to develop a partnership between dog and owner. Learn
more at schillinglawdog.com
|