By Michael Weber
The conversation around needing a new municipal jail in Eugene has been gaining traction in local Facebook groups like Lane County Mugshots Uncensored. As the discussion grows, I find myself questioning whether we really need additional jail space when the existing facilities in the area are nowhere near full capacity.
As of mid-January, the Springfield Municipal Jail is holding just 54 inmates, out of a possible 98. Meanwhile, the Lane County Jail currently houses 277 inmates, with a capacity for 507. These figures raise a simple question: Why are we even discussing building a Eugene municipal jail when the county jail we already have is underutilized?
There’s more to this issue than just capacity numbers. A significant number more of the empty beds in Lane County Jail could be rented to the Eugene Police Department or used for county inmates, but there has been no taxpayer funding allocated to cover the costs of those beds. If we’re not even making use of the available space for county or Eugene municipal inmates, why should we commit to building a municipal facility for Eugene that we can’t afford to operate?
It’s also important to consider that a Eugene municipal jail would likely only house inmates facing municipal court charges, which, much like the Springfield Jail, excludes felons and those facing serious charges in Lane County Circuit Court. Those individuals would still be sent to the larger Lane County Jail.
So, we’re left with the question: What exactly would we be gaining with a Eugene municipal jail? It seems to me that we should be looking more critically at how we approach sentencing guidelines, pre-trial detention policies and how long individuals can be held before trial.
Perhaps it’s time to evaluate sentencing guidelines to see if we, as a society, feel convicted individuals should serve longer sentences. If we believe suspects are being arrested only to be quickly released before their trial, maybe it’s time to consider stricter pre-trial release laws, particularly for repeat offenders or those who fail to appear in court as required.
We could be making meaningful changes in how the justice system handles these cases, instead of just expanding our jail system.
In my opinion, there is no urgent need for a municipal jail in Eugene, at least not until we can make full use of the beds we already have in the Lane County Jail. Why invest in new infrastructure when we can’t even afford to fill the empty beds that are already available?
Until taxpayers are willing to fund the use of the beds that remain unused, and until the county and the city can sit down and figure out a better agreement for the city of Eugene’s use of county beds, I don’t see why we should prioritize building a Eugene municipal jail space. Instead, let’s have a broader conversation about how we approach the justice system and whether changes need to be made to ensure fairness and accountability across the board.
The debate over jail space is far from over online, but at this point, it seems clear to me that our resources would be better spent on reforming how we handle sentencing, pre-trial release and overall criminal justice policy, rather than building a Eugene jail we don’t yet need.
Michael Weber, known for his extensive coverage of crime news in Lane County, continues to provide valuable updates to the local community. He runs the largest crime watch group in Lane County, Lane County Mugshots Uncensored, which currently has over 84,500 members. Support for local journalism is essential, and donations can be made via Venmo to @Michael-Weber-379 (last four digits of phone number: 0825).
A Note From the Publisher
Dear Readers,
The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.
That’s because of you!
Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.
Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.
We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.
And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.
None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.
As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.
Thank you for standing with us!
Publisher
Eugene Weekly
P.S. If you’d like to talk about supporting EW, I’d love to hear from you!
jody@eugeneweekly.com
(541) 484-0519