Time to Resist

Global warming is the most serious crisis that humanity has ever faced. The world is headed directly towards a cliff in the dark: We know the cliff is ahead of us, but we don’t know how soon we might reach it. Some people think that the countries of the world will not be able to do what is necessary to avoid millions of people suffering the death penalty as a result of global warming. When they express their defeatist attitude to others, they make things harder for those of us actively fighting global warming. Nobody can predict what the future will bring.

The coal, oil and automobile industries certainly have great power, but those of us fighting global warming also have some advantages. Politicians go to Washington, D.C., intending to do the right thing; in lobbying them, grassroots activists can explain to them that the coal companies do not want the right thing.

Environmentalists can use a moral logic in saying that people have an obligation to act as good stewards of the planet on behalf of future generations. Many of the possible victims of global warming cannot vote or speak out because they are not yet born.

Workers who lose their jobs because of the fight against global warming can hope to get green jobs, such as in public transit or renewable energy. Unemployed workers who are over 40 or who live in rural areas could have trouble finding work. UO sociologist Michael Dreiling suggests using the late labor leader Tony Mazzocchi’s idea of paying workers not to work — workers who lose their jobs because of the battle against global warming could get the equivalent of Social Security disability payments.

A single-payer health care system like in Canada would allow coal miners who become organic farmers to not have to worry about losing their union health insurance.

The U.S. government cannot deal with the global warming crisis alone, nor can it force a solution on the world; international negotiations are required. At the 2011 Durban Climate Change Conference, the world’s poorer countries agreed that they would be willing to have their greenhouse gas emissions limited under a new global warming treaty (they had no such obligations under the Kyoto Accord). The U.N. Durban conference created a timetable under which the Paris conference of December 2015 is the deadline for the world’s countries to negotiate a new treaty that would be ratified by 2020.

The Eugene-Springfield Solidarity Network/Jobs with Justice (ESSN) is a social justice organization that strongly supports justice for the labor movement, and social justice generally. ESSN brought Mark Reynolds of the Citizens Climate Lobby (CCL) to Eugene to start a local CCL chapter. CCL is creating the political will for Congress to pass a carbon tax under which all the tax money would go back to households. Putting a price on carbon would make the Keystone XL Pipeline economically unviable.

The U.S. Senate would need to ratify a new global warming treaty by a two-thirds majority. President Obama seems to have decided that the U.S. should not sign a treaty that the Senate would not ratify. Unless he can see how senators vote on a specific global warming bill, he cannot judge how strong of a treaty the U.S. should sign. China, India and the rest of the world’s poorer countries must agree that a new treaty is fair to them.

The CCL national leadership is aware of the need to convince Republican politicians that they should support a carbon tax, so CCL is attempting to organize chapters in more conservative parts of the U.S. CCL is unlikely to be successful without protests on the streets, but people can both protest and lobby.

One hopeful sign: the Financial Times reports that in the wake of the partial government shutdown, officials of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have indicated an intention to fund candidates in 2014 Republican primaries who would oppose Tea Party politicians.

The challenge that global warming poses is indeed great, but as J.R.R. Tolkien has Elrond say in The Fellowship of the Ring, “There is naught that you can do, other than to resist, with hope or without it.”

by: Milton Takei and Shelley Pineo-Hensen, Ph.D.

A Note From the Publisher

Dear Readers,

The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.

That’s because of you!

Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.

Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.

We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.

And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.

None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.

As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.

Thank you for standing with us!