Architecture Activist Barry Bergdoll to speak at UO

To introduce Columbia University’s Meyer Schapiro Professor of Art History and Archaeology Barry Bergdoll — who gives his talk “The Museum as Architectural Activist: The Art of Advocacy” Oct. 22 at the UO — I will use his own words:

“I don’t want to just show off the next handsome building. Architecture can be socially transformative. But I’m not interested in exhibiting something just because its intentions are good. Quality and aesthetics are still the final judgment.”

“We should look at what worked before cities were rewritten by cars and highways. We can learn how to build more ecologically.”

“It’s a tough time for architects and designers. We’re in the hangover of the housing boom. But I have an optimistic view. The economy is pushing people. Instead of designing pretty objects, we’re discussing design. There’s a new social commitment. Increasingly, architects are thinking about the relationship of their profession to the big problems of the world.”

This is an excerpt of an interview Bergdoll did with Elle Décor in 2013, when he was also chief curator of architecture and design at New York’s MoMA (Museum of Modern Art). In his positions at Columbia and MoMA, Bergdoll has earned a reputation for being a forward-thinking architecture scholar and activist, even though his bread and butter is 18th-century and 19th-century French and German architecture (see his book: European Architecture 1750-1890). At the MoMA, he curated exhibits that addressed modern problems, like in Foreclosed: Rehousing the American Dream, which had teams of architects, urban planners and engineers reimagine a sustainable future for American suburbia. With Rising Currents, Bergdoll gathered up-and-coming architects to solve the problem of rising sea levels in New York City; some of the solutions included wetland buffer zones and transforming canals into oyster hatcheries.

Rumors have it that he also put pressure on MoMA to preserve its purchased neighbor, the American Folk Art Museum, instead of demolishing the iconic building. If there is a question-answer session, this would be prime time to ask Bergdoll about the demolishing of our own city hall — what will we lose and what will we gain?

Bergdoll gives his talk 5:30 pm Wednesday, Oct. 22, at the UO, Lawrence Hall, Room 115; FREE.

A Note From the Publisher

Dear Readers,

The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.

That’s because of you!

Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.

Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.

We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.

And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.

None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.

As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.

Thank you for standing with us!