
Ron Howard has said that he hoped to make Eight Days a Week both for dedicated Beatles fans and for a younger generation that has little sense of who The Beatles were. I’m not sure where this leaves me, as I’m neither a millennial nor a Beatles diehard, but a person who appreciates a good music documentary. And Eight Days is fine — a solid mix of archival footage, new interviews with Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr, crowd-sourced footage and reminiscences from musicians or now-famous people who once saw The Beatles. Whoopi Goldberg is downright moving, talking about her relationship to the band, and a very young Sigourney Weaver is visible in a crowd shot at the Hollywood Bowl, her jawline and twinkling eyes unmistakable.
Eight Days has a lot to cover, which makes it feel more like a Beatles primer than a story about a band that managed to tour for only a few years of its wildly popular existence. They made a lot of money touring, and yet could still afford to quit — but what this says about their success is never explored. How did fans react, knowing they’d never see The Beatles together again? Has anyone else managed to leave the grind of life on the road and remain relevant, even on a smaller scale?
Howard as a director doesn’t seem interested in such questions, or really in understanding Beatlemania, which is disappointing. New Yorker critic Malcolm Gladwell briefly appears to explain that teen culture was rising to dominance in the U.S. at the time, a result of the baby boom. A press release at thebeatlesliveproject.com says that Howard’s film “will seek to explain what it was about that particular moment in time that allowed this cultural pivot point to occur. It will examine the social and political context of the time, and reveal the unique conditions that caused technology and mass communication to collide.”
Eight Days gestures in that direction, but it doesn’t cohere. Important things — a contract stipulating that the band would not perform in front of a segregated audience; brief reference to the opening bands being ignored by crowds; and, importantly, the perspective of the fans themselves — get little screen time. Live footage is fascinating, especially when you can tell just how deafening the screaming was and how little the band or anyone else could hear, but the story isn’t just in the shows; it’s all around them.
As an introductory text, so to speak, Eight Days gets the job done, and superfans will appreciate the new footage (including scenes from the final public performance at Candlestick Park and the true last performance on a rooftop in London). There’s just too much cultural weight around The Beatles to fit into this movie, which leaves it feeling like we’re revisiting familiar ground.
I kept wanting Howard to include other stories: who were those opening bands, and why are they hardly named? What happened to those screaming fans we always see in concert footage? When do they get to explain what Beatlemania was to them? Those, though, are different movies. I’d like to see them get made. (Broadway Metro)
A Note From the Publisher

Dear Readers,
The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.
That’s because of you!
Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.
Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.
We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.
And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.
None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.
As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.
Thank you for standing with us!

Publisher
Eugene Weekly
P.S. If you’d like to talk about supporting EW, I’d love to hear from you!
jody@eugeneweekly.com
(541) 484-0519