No Site Review for Parvin Butte

Thanks to what a local land use attorney calls “poorly written” land use code in Lane County, there’s no end in sight for the gravel mining of Parvin Butte. The 600-foot butte continues to be quarried by Lost Creek Rock Products (LCRP); the Dexter and Lost Creek neighbors who protest the mining have lost some ground in a recent Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision. LUBA decided Feb. 6 that LCRP does not need to undergo a site review in its mining operation at Parvin Butte.

For the neighbors, this means that the county will not regulate any of the disturbances caused by the mining, such as noise, dust and increased traffic. With no site review, the neighbors will not have the opportunity to participate in public input, which would allow them to comment on the regulation of the mining activities. Neighbors have complained of explosions that scare humans, pets and livestock and of speeding trucks on their rural roads.

“The decision says that the way the code is written, they don’t have to do any site review at all,” says Dan Stotter, the attorney for the neighbors. “But the language is very poorly written, and it is ambiguous as to whether site review is required or not required if there’s a 200-foot buffer.”

This 200-foot buffer around the mining site has served as a source of contention in the case. Last year, Lane County Hearings Official Gary Darnielle decided that LCRP’s truck traffic passing through the 200-foot buffer counted as mining activity within the buffer, which triggered site review.

The recent LUBA decision invalidated that ruling, allowing LCRP, a project of the McDougal brothers and Greg Demers, to continue their mining operations without site review.

Stotter says he will petition to the Oregon Court of Appeals, where the debate will continue as to whether or not site review is required. “The neighbors have to challenge this issue,” Stotter says. “They’re seeking to have some control. Without site review, this is a completely unregulated operation from the point of land use.”

A Note From the Publisher

Dear Readers,

The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.

That’s because of you!

Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.

Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.

We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.

And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.

None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.

As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.

Thank you for standing with us!