The Our Children’s Trust constitutional climate lawsuit lingers in limbo.
The scheduled Oct. 29 hearing has been vacated and is no longer on the court calendar as the youth and their attorneys await a decision from the U.S. Supreme Court (and its new justice, Brett Kavanaugh) on if and when the case can move forward in U.S. District Court here in Eugene.
The stay does not necessarily mean the case isn’t going forward, and this is not the first time the case has been brought to the Supreme Court.
On July 30, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of the 21 youth plaintiffs in Juliana v. United States, denying the Trump administration’s application for stay. The federal government has asked both the Supreme Court and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to stop the trial through a “writ of mandamus,” which a seldom-used procedure that lets a higher court to overrule a lower court before a verdict is made.
In their Oct. 22 response to the Trump administration’s most recent application for a stay, Our Children’s Trust says that first, this is not an environmental case, it’s a civil rights case. Second, it is “not a case that hinges on a newly recognized unenumerated fundamental right, as the DOJ misstates,” that the “length of trial and its cost are not enough to show irreparable harm for purposes of a stay and are not a legitimate basis to stop a trial on the constitutional rights of children.” And finally the youth plaintiffs assert, “Contrary to the assertions of the Trump administration, this trial will not intrude on the ability of the executive branch to carry out its functions. There will be no confidential information disclosed in discovery or at the trial.”
According to the Supreme Court’s docket, the U.S. government responded Oct. 24 and essentially reiterated its previous arguments. The removal from the court calendar can be described as a kind of “housekeeping” pending a SCOTUS decision.
Meg Ward of Our Children’s Trust tells EW, “The Supreme Court has not issued a ruling and [Judge Ann] Aiken vacated the trial dates while this is pending before SCOTUS. She will schedule trial quickly after the stay is lifted.”
The constitutional case is based on the public trust doctrine, arguing that if the government is causing harm to the climate system, it needs to be enjoined to stop that harm. The youths, now ages 10 to 21, filed against the federal government in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon in 2015.
A rally with the youth plaintiffs will still go forward on Oct. 29.
A Note From the Publisher
Dear Readers,
The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.
That’s because of you!
Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.
Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.
We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.
And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.
None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.
As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.
Thank you for standing with us!
Publisher
Eugene Weekly
P.S. If you’d like to talk about supporting EW, I’d love to hear from you!
jody@eugeneweekly.com
(541) 484-0519
Comments are closed.