Earlier this month Stacey Black submitted a letter decrying the whooping cough vaccine, but her assertions are untrue. The whooping cough vaccine is a safe and effective.
Statements like “78 percent of the people who caught whooping cough in Lane County this year were fully vaccinated” are meaningless without including more demographic information. For example, suppose that out of a population of 100,000, 100 people develop pertussis. Seventy-eight of those people were vaccinated and 22 were not. If we assume a 90 percent vaccination rate, that means 9000 people in that population are vaccinated, and 1000 people are not vaccinated.
78 divided by 9000 = 0.87 percent of the vaccinated people got sick
22 divided by 1000= 2.2 percent of the unvaccinated people got sick
A much higher percentage of the unvaccinated people got the illness, showing the vaccine has efficacy. This demonstrates why statements like those made by Black are not helpful in determining vaccine efficacy, and how out of context, they can be misleading.
Black is also concerned about formaldehyde in the vaccine. Formaldehyde is used to inactivate bacterial products and decontaminate the vaccine during production. Most formaldehyde is then removed from the vaccine. Formaldehyde is a naturally occuring compound and the small amounts that circulate in the bloodstream far exceed the amount in a single dose of vaccine.
All in all, the pertussis vaccine is safe, effective and helps protect our children from a potentially deadly, contagious disease.
Emily Dalton
Pediatrician, Eugene
Pediatric Associates
A Note From the Publisher
Dear Readers,
The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.
That’s because of you!
Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.
Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.
We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.
And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.
None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.
As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.
Thank you for standing with us!
Publisher
Eugene Weekly
P.S. If you’d like to talk about supporting EW, I’d love to hear from you!
jody@eugeneweekly.com
(541) 484-0519
Comments are closed.