Jerry Ritter’s letter in your July 1 issue, “CRT Is Not About Equity,” demonstrates that ignorance is no basis for policy. EW’s earlier Slant item on Critical Race Theory didn’t explain why legal scholars wanted to develop a theory “interrogating the role of race and racism in society” (again quoting the American Bar Association). Legal scholars had wondered: Why do Black people continue to suffer extraordinary disadvantages after the 1960s passage of laws intended to bring them equal American citizenship?
CRT is an outgrowth of Critical Legal Studies, which views law as designed to maintain the status quo of society’s power structures, while keeping the disadvantaged marginalized. CRT deploys a racial focus. Taking two glaring recent examples, why did a policeman murder Philando Castile, who was telling the officer that he was a licensed gun owner? Why did a policeman murder 12-year-old Tamir Rice playing with a toy pistol in a park? Or consider George Floyd. If they were white, wouldn’t they be alive?
Ritter cites a Black writer vehemently attacking CRT, ignoring that Black conservatives can exhibit racial biases, like Justice Clarence Thomas, whose first Supreme Court opinion (Hudson v. McMillian) asserted that beating a shackled Black prison inmate, loosening his teeth, cracking his dental plate etc. was OK.
Black folks’ disadvantages are obvious to anyone acquainted with the actual history, not a blinkered mythology (let alone a white supremacist ideology), of race relations in the U.S.
Students learning this actual history augurs “a more perfect union.”
Larry Koenigsberg
Eugene
A Note From the Publisher
Dear Readers,
The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.
That’s because of you!
Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.
Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.
We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.
And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.
None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.
As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.
Thank you for standing with us!
Publisher
Eugene Weekly
P.S. If you’d like to talk about supporting EW, I’d love to hear from you!
jody@eugeneweekly.com
(541) 484-0519
Comments are closed.