Many thanks to writer Cole Sinanian (“The Forgotten Answer to the Affordable Housing Crisis,” EW 2/3) for highlighting the little-understood affordable housing model of a limited equity co-op on community land trust property, utilized by Square One Villages and Dylan Lamar for the C Street Co-op. The LEC/CLT concept is exactly what people like me are promoting as we oppose the tragically ill-advised HB 2001 adoption proposal endorsed by the Eugene Planning Commission.
I can only imagine the EPC succumbed to lobbying pressures from the National Associations of Realtors and Home Builders when it accepted the planning staff proposal to far exceed the state’s already very substantial HB 2001 required infill allowances. This foolish plan freely hands over additional incentives to all builders instead of wisely using the available leverage to assist those committed to building our most desperately needed housing such as Square One and Lamar.
According to the city’s own analysis, the housing deficit of 13,500 units for people in income levels served by projects like C Street Co-op and Emerald Village vastly outnumbers that at any other level. There is currently a relatively modest need for housing at the middle income level (1,700 units), and a 5,700-unit surplus of high-end units.
This is only one of many prudent reasons the Eugene city councilors should reject the EPC recommendation and limit initial code adoption to the fundamental HB 2001 requirements, reserving additional incentives for most needed permanent affordable housing. Remember, once passed, it cannot be easily undone.
Pam Wooddell
Eugene
A Note From the Publisher
Dear Readers,
The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.
That’s because of you!
Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.
Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.
We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.
And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.
None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.
As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.
Thank you for standing with us!
Publisher
Eugene Weekly
P.S. If you’d like to talk about supporting EW, I’d love to hear from you!
jody@eugeneweekly.com
(541) 484-0519
Comments are closed.