A few weeks ago, the Weekly published a letter of mine, defending the Eugene Transportation Planning department’s bicycle lane upgrade of 13th Avenue. I also suggested that the roundabouts in the proposed upgrade of the Franklin Boulevard corridor would be an improvement because roundabouts move traffic much more efficiently than traditional traffic-light systems.
But having read the “request-to-stop” advertisement in the June 29 Weekly, I’m now concerned about the proposed elimination of the westbound left turn onto Orchard Street, especially.
The Transportation Planning department doesn’t have a great track record of major upgrades that work well (enough) for all primary stakeholders, resulting in a backlog of ill will that colors the Franklin Boulevard controversy. So I’m writing now to request that the department step back and consider the raised concerns.
First, I suggest an experiment: temporarily shutdown the existing Orchard Street left turn, on alternating weeks, to gather actual data. Monitor any traffic pattern changes and work with the Hirons and Market of Choice companies to determine if there’s any correlation between turn-lane closures and weekly revenue. And, of course, compensate them if necessary.
Second, provide a forum that initially addresses the already known concerns, then provides ample time for people to express their unresolved concerns, and then address those concerns, too.
The future of the Transportation Planning department’s political independence is at stake. If the result is yet another poorly thought-through design, a political solution will surely come.
Peter Straton
Eugene
A Note From the Publisher
Dear Readers,
The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.
That’s because of you!
Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.
Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.
We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.
And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.
None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.
As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.
Thank you for standing with us!
Publisher
Eugene Weekly
P.S. If you’d like to talk about supporting EW, I’d love to hear from you!
jody@eugeneweekly.com
(541) 484-0519
Comments are closed.