![]()
THE OTHER 10 BY JASON BLAIR
![]() |
Babel A complex film that deserves enormous praise for its uncompromising structure, not to mention its fearless performances (excluding Brad Pitt, whose attention is clearly elsewhere). Still, as impressive as Babel can be, Alejandro González Iñárritu (21 Grams, Amores Perros) is quickly becoming a master of brutal, depressive filmmaking. Impossible to ignore, but possessing an openly dismal outlook, Iñárritu earns praise despite the bleakness, not because of it. (11/9/06)
Brick Would you accept a stylized, noirish thriller set at a high school in Southern California? Me neither. But Brick works beautifully. The wise-guy language in this nimble adolescent fantasy is straight Dashiell Hammett with a chaser of Orange County slang. Joseph Gordon-Levitt plays the wounded gumshoe to perfection, and Lukas Haas hasn’t been this good since Witness. There are virtually no adults present, but when they do intrude the movie is at its best. Brick is destined to be the next Donnie Darko. Get on board early. Tell your friends. (8/3/06)
Half Nelson A tough, compassionate film about trying to help others when you can’t even help yourself. Ryan Gosling won’t win Best Actor for his idealistic but addicted inner-city teacher, but his nomination proves the Academy is still awake. With this performance, he joins the likes of Joaquin Phoenix and Christian Bale as an actor who can do almost anything. Gosling’s unlikely friend, young newcomer Shareeka Epps, amazes. (10/19/06)
![]() |
Little Miss Sunshine A film that restores your faith in filmmaking. It took years to cast and create, but the struggle clearly paid off. The movie veers toward silliness in parts, particularly when a deceased Alan Arkin “jumps the shark” out a hospital window, but the overall result is sweet, offbeat and funny. Abigail Breslin, who’s popping up everywhere, gives a quirky, self-possessed performance. As with Brokeback Mountain in 2005, the Oscar hype is almost unfair to this little film. It may result in a backlash. (8/24/06)
Pan’s Labyrinth An unclassifiable film. Pan’s Labyrinth is a quest movie about a quest that goes astray (twice); a tale of survival in which nearly everyone dies; and a child’s tale set against the horrors of fascism containing scenes of terrible violence. Original in almost every way but less than totally satisfying, given that the entire film chronicles Ofelia’s attempts to penetrate the underworld — but not, crucially, her experience of the underworld itself. It’s as if The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe were all about trying to pry the wardrobe open. Still, Pan’s Labyrinth is a visual feast, and a moving ode to the joys and terrors of childhood. (2/8/07)
The Prestige For my money, this is how big-budget films should be made, with complex structures, puzzles in the center and star turns put to good use. Intellectually, The Prestige astounds. It may have been too clever for its own good, not that director Christopher Nolan (Memento, Batman Begins) would admit that. To my mind, The Prestige may have been confused with (and therefore doomed by) The Illusionist, in that strange way Hollywood has of releasing movies in thematic pairs (Tombstone and Wyatt Earp, Capote and Infamous). Christian Bale continues to impress, filling the void left when Billy Crudup began voicing the MasterCard ads. Hugh Jackman finally gets his hands dirty. (10/26/06)
![]() |
The Proposition A bleak but confident Western (Western Australia, that is) about three brothers and the cyclical nature of violence. The screenplay, by musician Nick Cave, has the qualities of great fiction: It’s economical but emotionally complex. The landscape cinematography is the best in recent memory, reminiscent of Terrence Malick’s classic Days of Heaven. Nominated for virtually every award in Australia when released there in 2005, it was largely overlooked here. Guy Pearce mesmerizes, as always, although he seems to have entered semi-retirement. (6/15/06)
The Queen Helen Mirren gives a singular performance in a film that was more tedious and cautious than other critics would admit. The film’s purposeful, jacketed qualities may have reflected the restraint of its subject. Still, there are a number of great turns here that elevate the material, although Mirren is in a class by herself. Her Queen Elizabeth II is the definitive on-screen version of Her Majesty. The stag in the film has engendered much debate — real or not? Diana or not? — but if it looks like a stag and acts like a stag … (11/30/06)
Shut Up and Sing Stand up and clap. If you thought Natalie Maines’ anti-war comments in 2003 were courageous, that was only the beginning. The incident, which prompted an unofficial boycott by fans and radio stations alike, still haunts the trio today. You’ll be pumping your fists at the Dixie Chicks’ utter defiance of redneck hypocrisy, even as they struggle with the prospect of re-inventing themselves. Maines’ incessant soap-boxing grows wearisome, but almost everything she says is true. (12/21/06)
![]() |
Stranger Than Fiction Will Ferrell gets the Eternal Sunshine treatment, but that doesn’t make Stranger than Fiction derivative. One hopes this marks a new direction for Ferrell, who’s flirting with overexposure. In Stranger than Fiction, he plays someone you won’t soon forget: Harold Crick, IRS agent and doomed hero (it appears) of writer Kay Eiffel’s (Emma Thompson) novel. Ferrell bring Crick to life, despite the fact that Crick doesn’t have one. It’s a vivid performance of a gentle genius who overcomes his fears to get the most unlikely girl, all while confronting almost certain death. In other words, it’s not your typical Will Ferrell movie. For that reason alone, I rejoiced. (11/16/06)
Jason Blair’s Top 10 | Molly Templeton’s Top 10
Jason’s Other 10 | Molly’s Other 10 | Notable Performaces
A Note From the Publisher

Dear Readers,
The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.
That’s because of you!
Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.
Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.
We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.
And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.
None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.
As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.
Thank you for standing with us!

Publisher
Eugene Weekly
P.S. If you’d like to talk about supporting EW, I’d love to hear from you!
jody@eugeneweekly.com
(541) 484-0519



