MOVIE REVIEW ARCHIVE | THEATER INFO | MOVIE LISTINGS
Oil Change
The case against Chevron in Ecuador
by Jason Blair
CRUDE: Directed by Joe Berlinger. Cinematography, Pocho Alvarez, Michael Bonfiglio, Juan David Pérez and Berlinger. Music, Wendy Blackstone. First Run Features, 2009. Unrated. 105 minutes. 
 |
Watching Crude, the engrossing documentary by Joe Berlinger (Brother’s Keeper, Metallica: Some Kind of Monster), my thoughts went regularly to Michael Moore. Moore, with his bull-in-a-china-shop technique, is documentary cinema’s loudest yeller, whereas Berlinger understands that few stories, if any, can’t benefit from careful observation. Crude is a classic David and Goliath story — one in which a petroleum company flagrantly and systematically poisons the native tribes of Ecuador — yet the film resounds with understatement. Berlinger is an adherent of the “direct cinema” tradition, in which the filmmaker remains unobtrusive and observational, rather than provocative or influential. It’s an approach that allows the most one-dimensional stories to steep so as to better take their flavor. This includes the case of Texaco-Chevron’s contamination of Ecuador, a legacy commonly referred to as the “Amazon Chernobyl.”
The heart of Crude is Pablo Fajardo, a former oil field employee who became a lawyer after witnessing the devastation in his industry. Gentle and youthful despite long hours and repeated setbacks in the case — filed as Aguinda v. Texaco in 1993 — his is outlook almost childlike. His logic is serene in its defiance: “I know I always tell the truth, and if I have to die for it, then I will with pleasure.” His mentor and translator is Steven Donziger, an American lawyer who’s billed as a consultant but who excels at PR and occasionally bullying the opposition. I won’t soon forget Donziger confronting a Texaco lawyer in a cramped office, the men’s fingers lodged in each others’ faces, each calling the other corrupt. The old joke about what to call 100 lawyers at the bottom of the sea (“A good idea”) seems feeble and naïve after watching Crude.
The film is structured around two lines of action, the court proceeding in Ecuador and the efforts by Fajardo and Donziger to raise interest in their case worldwide. Ecuardorian law being somewhat provincial, it’s the court case that packs the most drama, given that legal proceedings are conducted outdoors where the public can assemble and watch. Berlinger is so effective not because he’s unbiased or objective; strictly speaking, he’s neither. While he allows the Chevron lawyers and scientists to make their case, Berlinger has perfected what I’d call the “subtle repudiation” shot. In one example, after Chevron’s chief scientist claims there’s “absolutely no evidence” of elevated health risks in the region, we cut to the court proceedings, where a core sample resembling a chunk of asphalt is pulled from the mucky ground. In another example, the same scientist explains that the full-body rashes, which afflict local infants almost universally, are due to “fecal matter” in the river, after which Berlinger cuts to a petroleum rainbow floating through a kids’ swimming hole.
Berlinger’s techniques give Crude the quality of a thriller, with all the investigative prowess of traditional journalism. He’s as patient as a novelist in his approach to this material, even the material that makes your stomach turn, like the poisoned chickens, a duck in its death throes or the deformed faces of children. Eventually, there’s a bit a good news, including a long Vanity Fair article and some interest by Sting’s wife, Trudie Styler, a founder of Rainforest Foundation. But the case is still mired in legal muck, if you will, with no happy ending in sight.
Crude opens Friday, Feb. 19, at the Bijou. Steven Donziger speaks at the Public Interest Environmental Law Conference at 7 pm Thursday, Feb. 25, in the UO’s EMU Ballroom. For more on Fajardo’s fight with Chevron, see EW‘s 8/13/09 cover story.
A Note From the Publisher
Dear Readers,
The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.
That’s because of you!
Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.
Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.
We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.
And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.
None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.
As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.
Thank you for standing with us!
Publisher
Eugene Weekly
P.S. If you’d like to talk about supporting EW, I’d love to hear from you!
jody@eugeneweekly.com
(541) 484-0519