Extension Risks Extinction
Measure 20-158 would keep it going
By Deborah Bloom
Lane County’s commitment to OSU’s Extension Service will be tested May 18 by the primary election results of Measure 20-158.
A county-supported program since 1918, the Extension Service is comprised of a 650-person network that provides research-based educational programs that center around community development. Programs include 4-H Youth Development, Climate Masters, Master Gardeners, Compost Specialists and many more.
This ballot measure, first proposed by Extension Service supporters and volunteers to the Lane County Board of Commissioners in December, would levy a $.05 increase on every $1,000 of assessed property value — that’s a $10 tax for someone who owns a $200,000 home. The revenue raised, estimated to be $6.2 million by 2015, will be used to supplement the Extension’s educational programs, office operations and support staff.
A local group, Friends4Better Solutions, opposes the measure, describing such a tax-levy to be an inefficient use of taxpayer money. However, another local group, Save Lane Extension, calls the ballot initiative a practical step with measurable outcomes.
Friends4Better Solutions treasurer Cindy Land said that Lane County’s Extension Service should be self-funded, functioning with a nonprofit business model that generates local profit. “It’s a good program, but it’s not the only program, and it’s not a program that should be funded with taxpayer money,” Land said. “We have a lot of needs in our community.”
In the past, Lane County has matched its funding for the Extension Service with federal and state monies. Local backing was withdrawn for the Extension Service in 2008 amidst budgetary shortfalls, causing the service to cut back on staff and faculty, pursue grants and contracts, reduce educational programs, increase participation fees and fundraise. However, according to Save Lane Extension publicity chair John Crosiar, these efforts were unsuccessful. “It wasn’t a sustainable business model for the program. By the very laws that established the national program, it’s not how the extension services are meant to operate.”
The failure to pass Measure 20-158 would, according to the Save Lane Extension website, result in the loss of a “trusted local source of information that teaches self-sufficiency, sustainability and a variety of life skills.” Programs would be reassigned to other Oregon counties and Eugene’s Extension Service volunteer network would disband.
Land expressed concern over the precedent that would be set by this nominal tax increase. “With 82 different tax service districts, this adds an 83rd. At what point do you break the taxpayers’ back?”
“There are many people who rely on this, especially many low-income people,” said Crosiar. “This is the most cost-effective way to do this.”
“With the recent increase in food gardening, the availability of a food safety resource is imperative,” wrote Karren Cholewinski of the Extension Service Lane County office in a letter to the editor last week, referring to the Master Food Preservation program. “The state-funded faculty member supplies the practical research-based training, volunteer management and food safety/safe food handling instruction.”
A Note From the Publisher
Dear Readers,
The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.
That’s because of you!
Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.
Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.
We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.
And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.
None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.
As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.
Thank you for standing with us!
Publisher
Eugene Weekly
P.S. If you’d like to talk about supporting EW, I’d love to hear from you!
jody@eugeneweekly.com
(541) 484-0519