Biking the Interchange
ODOTs I-5/Beltline path plan has six underpasses
By Alan Pittman
People on bikes and foot will finally have a way to cross the great wall of Beltline in north Eugene, but they may have to go through a warren of underpasses to do it.
The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) unveiled draft plans for a long-sought bike path under or over the Beltline freeway that severs north and south Eugene. The proposed $1 million route would include six underpasses winding through ODOTs I-5 Beltline, $200 million highway spaghetti interchange project.
Members of the Eugene Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) questioned why ODOT wouldnt build a single bike bridge with a safe, direct connection rather than the complex system of underpasses.
The proposed plan creates a “rabbit warren” of safety issues, BPAC member David Gizara said. “Why are you building so many things? Why arent you doing a straight line?”
Anya Dobrowolski said many women may not feel safe going under the roads. “The night time issues are huge,” she said.
BPAC city staffer Lindsay Selser said an existing narrow underpass under the railroad tracks in southeast Eugene near I-5 is “horrible, stinky, smelly, creepy, gross.” She said, “its where attacks happen in my head.”
But ODOTs project leader Anne Sanders said the state highway department quickly dismissed the bike bridge alternative. “Economically and practically, it wasnt going to be an option.”
ODOT interchange designer Carl Deaton said he started to look at a bike bridge, but found that at an acceptable grade, it would have to be “very long” to get over the elevated flyover ramp and need more right of way. He estimated such a big bridge could cost roughly $6 million, almost three times the cost of the new bike suspension bridge over I-5 to the Gateway Mall. “I knew it was a big cost; I knew Id have to start taking homes, so I stopped,” Deaton said.
“We really dont have the budget for it,” Sanders said.
Gizara made a motion that BPAC formally ask ODOT to perform a more complete analysis of a bridge.
Gizara said a bridge crossing will be more used than the undercrossings and could serve growth and big employers in the area like the new hospital. “Cutting it down to that one crossing is going to be money well spent,” he said. “How much are you spending on cars?”
But BPAC member Fred Tepfer, a UO planner, said many people wouldnt want to climb such a long, tall bridge to get over Beltline. “Its ridiculously long,” he said. “There is no good solution here, so Im not sure spending more money is better.”
Gizaras motion died for a lack of consensus on BPAC.
Deaton said the underpasses would have more open, slanted walls and possibly lighting to increase safety.
Another option would be one longer underpass under Beltline. But Deaton said that would add the expense of a new Beltline road bridge to the interchange project.
“Long tunnels are enormously scary to people,” Tepfer also said.
Another option not discussed at the BPAC meeting would be to move the bike bridge farther west to avoid the flyover and cross at a lower point. But that could require buying a right of way from The Register-Guard headquarters.
BPAC members thanked ODOT for working on the bike connection. A way to get past the Beltline wall has long been sought by local bicyclists. Busy Coburg Road offers only a long and dangerous detour. The path would connect to existing paths leading to the riverfront paths and Gateway mall and could be heavily used by neighborhoods and commuters to businesses on Chad Drive and/or recreational cyclists heading to rural routes.
A version of this story first appeared at EugeneCycles.com
 |
|
source: ODOT
|
A Note From the Publisher
Dear Readers,
The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.
That’s because of you!
Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.
Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.
We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.
And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.
None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.
As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.
Thank you for standing with us!
Publisher
Eugene Weekly
P.S. If you’d like to talk about supporting EW, I’d love to hear from you!
jody@eugeneweekly.com
(541) 484-0519