City Club Shocker
Auditor, police chief back Tasers, despite abuse
by Alan Pittman
Eugene’s new police auditor, Mark Gissiner, sided with the police chief against civil liberties advocates calling for restrictions on Taser use at the Eugene City Club July 31.
“In the United States of America we should consider it a good tool,” said Gissiner.
But Claire Syrett of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) faulted EPD for unnecessarily using a lethal weapon linked to hundreds of deaths in America. “Tasers should be used only as an alternative to deadly force,” Syrett said, citing ACLU’s recommendation that the Eugene police change their Taser policy.
Asked whether EPD would change their loose policy to only use Tasers as an alternative to deadly force, acting Police Chief Pete Kerns answered, “No.”
The current EPD policy contains few if any effective restrictions on the use of Tasers. Police video from May 2008 has documented an EPD officer Tasering an unarmed environmental protestor twice in the back while he lay face down on the ground with his arms pinned under his side or held behind his back.
An annual report by the acting police auditor and Citizens Review Board written before Gissiner came to Eugene last month found other inappropriate Taser use by EPD. For example, Eugene police Tasered a non-responsive, non-threatening mentally ill man who was standing still. The auditor/CRB report stated, “Members of the community share our concern that the [Taser] is being used too often as a pain compliance tool and not in a manner in which it represents a clear alternative to lethal force.”
After the City Club debate, Gissiner stood with a group of police officers, nodding and agreeing with their statements supporting Tasers. Asked about the CRB/Auditor report, Gissiner claimed he had read it but could not remember the Taser passages. “It was a pretty lengthy report,” he said. Gissiner declined to comment on the appropriateness of using the Taser on the non-threatening, mentally ill victim.
Gissiner was hired with the enthusiastic backing of conservative city councilors highly critical of previous independent auditors who have questioned EPD use of force. But Gissiner denied he would make the supposedly independent police auditor function more pro-police. “I’m neutral,” Gissiner said.
Gissiner said Cincinnati, Ohio, where he worked on police oversight was “very conservative,” but he had opposed Taser use in one case. He said he supports Tasers “only if they’re used in an appropriate manner.”
The auditor/CRB report called for equipping all EPD Tasers, rather than just a few, with video cameras like the one that caught the police shocking the environmental protester. But Kerns refused, arguing the cameras aren’t worth the money.
“It’s because they don’t want to be filmed using them,” said Lauren Regan, director of the Civil Liberties Defense Center in Eugene. Regan cited a $6 million verdict against another city for a Taser-induced heart attack and warned that taxpayers may end up covering the bill for EPD Taser misuse.
“Tasers are unregulated, dangerous deadly weapons that are fraught with abuse,” Regan said. She cited national studies linking Tasers to 371 deaths, indicating Tasers increase deaths without decreasing officer injuries, and indicating Tasers are used overwhelmingly against people who are unarmed and minorities.
Regan said the 50,000-volt weapons
are most often used as “a form of torture” and “terrorism” to get non-dangerous people to follow officer orders or to punish them on the street without a trial. “They are in essence high-tech cattle prods,” she said.
“The Eugene Police Department cannot be trusted with Tasers,” said Regan, who drew the biggest applause at the City Club. She cited the auditor/CRB report stating that with Eugene police, “force, once required, too quickly escalates to excessive force and injury to the arrestee.”
Eugene police used their fatal shooting of Ryan Salisbury in 2006 to justify getting Tasers. But Regan cited multiple studies indicating Tasers are far less effective with mentally ill people. She noted that police had already shot Salisbury with multiple bags of lead shot from a shotgun (bean bags). A Taser also “would probably have been ineffective on him.”
“I don’t think our policy now reflects the majority values of our community,” Syrett of the ACLU said. But she said she doubted the EPD would change the policy. “If we want to affect a difference, citizens are going to have to make their voices heard.”
A Note From the Publisher
Dear Readers,
The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.
That’s because of you!
Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.
Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.
We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.
And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.
None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.
As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.
Thank you for standing with us!
Publisher
Eugene Weekly
P.S. If you’d like to talk about supporting EW, I’d love to hear from you!
jody@eugeneweekly.com
(541) 484-0519