New video of Kesey Square controversy

Local videographer Daniel Dronsfield has made a part two to his "The Sale of Kesey Square" series. Dronsfield came to the Downtown Solutions Forum at LCC's downtown campus Dec. 2 and interviewed Mayor Kitty Piercy, Councilor Betty Taylor, Senior City Planner Nan Laurence, The Barn Light owner Thomas Pettus-Czar and business owner and UO senior instructor of finance Ali Emami. See the video below the highlights. Find links to all EW's coverage of Kesey Square below the video.

Some highlights:

Daniel Dronsfield narration: "After all these interviews and the forum, I heard a lot of things, but never did I hear anyone ardently advocate for apartments. Even the most prominent critics of the square seemed to harbor some hope for its salvation."

Councilor Betty Taylor: "Downtown belongs to everyone, it doesn’t just belong to people who have business down there."

-"We need more people to get involved. When it's gone, we can't get it back."

-"Obvsiously the city has never helped him," Betty Taylor says of Ali Emami's plan. "We've helped other businesses. I don't know why we haven't helped him do something to improve the area."

Zane Kesey: "Kesey Square is why I came and it seems like why most of the people came and boy they come up with a lot of good ideas."

Barn Light owner Thomas Pettus-Czar: "A lot of folks consider it to be very small in turns of public space. One cultural group will occupy the space and other folks don't feel comfortable sharing it."

Senior City Planner Nan Laurence: "It’s vacant the majority of the time or used by people who have no other place to go. And it's not nessecarily a safe place to be when that's the case. Places that are active have all kinds of people."

Business owner Ali Emami: "RFEI. It's biased. It excludes people from particpation. It has a really short time span, about five weeks. If I want to put a proposal together it costs about $40,000 just to give to the architects to put a plan for you together. It's not a fair game. It's biased. As they indicated in the press, they want to start building in May. So that tells you the process.

See all our coverage of Kesey Square here:

Find all of our 2015 coverage of the Kesey Square controversy here:

12/15: "The story behind the Chamber of Commerce endorsement to privatize Kesey Square"

12/10: "Support for Kesey Square Highlights Public Forum: Zane Kesey wants to keep square public"

12/3: "Voodoo Doughnut, Community Group want Kesey Square kept public"

11/25: "City to issue requests from private sector only for Kesey Square"

11/19: "Apathy Made Visible: The tale of one city square and the city that wouldn't save it"

11/5: "One Flew Over Kesey Square: Business owner’s plan calls for incubators and public space downtown, not apartments"

10/22: "Property Owner Offers To Open Up Brick Walls Of Kesey Square"

5/7: "Sometimes a Great Plaza: The quest to turn Kesey Square into a vibrant public space"

4/16: "Playing Offense at Kesey Square: Adapting a public space for people, not against people"

A Note From the Publisher

Dear Readers,

The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.

That’s because of you!

Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.

Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.

We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.

And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.

None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.

As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.

Thank you for standing with us!