The 4J School Board heard more public testimony March 20 both in support of and in opposition to the district’s move to a common high school schedule, and against cuts to health and library programs. And the board’s chair proposed holding more feedback sessions with teachers and community members.
At the start of the meeting, Board Chair Jennifer Geller acknowledged that “in retrospect, we understand and believe that more could have been done to work with additional stakeholders and our teachers to understand the perceived and real issues” regarding the schedule change. After spring break, she said, the board would like the district to convene discussions with parents and teachers. The board also wants the Eugene Education Association (EEA) to set a weekly time for teachers to talk to board members about any issue.
Expecting a large turnout, the board reduced the time members of the public could speak from three minutes each to two.
Public comment about the schedule change ranged from continued requests to delay implementation to concern about teachers not supporting moving ahead. Some 91 percent of teachers at North Eugene High School, 81 percent of teachers at Sheldon High School and 74 percent of teachers at South Eugene High School have signed a petition expressing their concerns about the change and requesting a delay in implementation.
“This is a year when we are facing a very large budget shortfall,” said parent T.J. Forrester. “It’s not the time to be implementing a new program when you do not have a handle on potential problems.” Forrester mentioned a 2011 study of Superintendent Sheldon Berman’s former district, which moved a number of schools to a 3×5 schedule. The study, “The Structure of Time: How Trimester Schedules Impact Teaching and learning in the Jefferson County Public Schools of Louisville, Kentucky,” showed what Forrester terms “mixed results.”
“We need to study, we need to quantify and learn from the academic and financial effects of the schedule change at Churchill High School after the completion of the school year, instead of relying on anecdotal evidence,” he said.
Alex Thies, a recent North graduate, cited several reasons he opposes the 3×5 schedule, but his comments about teacher-student relationships struck a chord amid proposals to cut programs. “Teachers will have less time to learn about their students, and thus be ill equipped to look for the warning signs of problems arising in each of their student’s lives,” he said. “This reduced observation time taking place while we simultaneously cut our mental health professionals will surely lead to students falling through the cracks and being left behind.”
EEA President Tad Shannon said he was disappointed that the board’s work session on the common schedule failed to include a single teacher.
Several people spoke in favor of the schedule change.
South Principal Randy Bernstein said a common schedule won’t end site-based decision-making. “Teachers in every school will continue to be the creative and innovative professionals that they’ve always been,” he said.
Others spoke against cutting mental health services, closing high school clinics and curtailing library services. These have been suggested as ways 4J can trim its anticipated $10 million budget shortfall next year. But even with such cuts, increases in class size and more furlough days are expected. — Anne Bridgman
A Note From the Publisher

Dear Readers,
The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.
That’s because of you!
Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.
Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.
We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.
And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.
None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.
As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.
Thank you for standing with us!

Publisher
Eugene Weekly
P.S. If you’d like to talk about supporting EW, I’d love to hear from you!
jody@eugeneweekly.com
(541) 484-0519