Beamud Slams ‘Twisted Scrutiny’ of Police Auditor

The allegations that resulted in the Eugene City Council putting interim Police Auditor Dawn Reynolds on leave are â€œdisturbing and disruptiveâ€ and lack merit, Eugeneâ€™s previous auditor Cris Beamud said in a written statement.

â€œI have had an opportunity to speak with Dawn Reynolds, and I do not believe that the allegations against her are meritorious,â€ wrote Beamud, who left Eugene last summer to head the police oversight system in Atlanta.

Interim deputy auditor Elizabeth Southworth accused Reynolds of disclosing confidential information and the city council met in a session closed to the public on Saturday and put Reynolds on administrative leave while investigating the complaint.

â€œIt doesnâ€™t sit well that the auditor would be exposed to such scrutiny for so little,â€ said Beamud in an interview.

â€œThe information that she [Reynolds] disclosed to the lawyer representing a complainant was not privileged or private or even investigatory in nature,â€ Beamud wrote in her statement. â€œYou cannot take otherwise public information and transform it into privileged information by putting it in a file. That is exactly what some members of the police department would like to do.â€

Beamud continued, â€œNo human being can withstand the twisted scrutiny that the police would like to impose on the auditor. This is a very difficult position, and I do not believe that any person can do this type of work without the support of the city council. The city council needs to examine the nature of the allegation, including the Auditorâ€™s perspective before doing anything that undermines her authority and ability to do her work.â€

Munir Katul a physician who resigned three months ago after serving on the Civilian Review Board said he agreed with Beamud. He said the council should not have put the auditor on administrative leave before hearing from Reynolds, who he said is recovering from surgery. â€œItâ€™s not like a cop shooting and killing somebody,â€ Katul said of the leave. â€œI think this is ridiculous. This is implying far greater guilt for the auditor.â€

A Note From the Publisher

Dear Readers,

The last two years have been some of the hardest in Eugene Weekly’s 43 years. There were moments when keeping the paper alive felt uncertain. And yet, here we are — still publishing, still investigating, still showing up every week.

That’s because of you!

Not just because of financial support (though that matters enormously), but because of the emails, notes, conversations, encouragement and ideas you shared along the way. You reminded us why this paper exists and who it’s for.

Listening to readers has always been at the heart of Eugene Weekly. This year, that meant launching our popular weekly Activist Alert column, after many of you told us there was no single, reliable place to find information about rallies, meetings and ways to get involved. You asked. We responded.

We’ve also continued to deepen the coverage that sets Eugene Weekly apart, including our in-depth reporting on local real estate development through Bricks & Mortar — digging into what’s being built, who’s behind it and how those decisions shape our community.

And, of course, we’ve continued to bring you the stories and features many of you depend on: investigations and local government reporting, arts and culture coverage, sudoku and crossword puzzles, Savage Love, and our extensive community events calendar. We feature award-winning stories by University of Oregon student reporters getting real world journalism experience. All free. In print and online.

None of this happens by accident. It happens because readers step up and say: this matters.

As we head into a new year, please consider supporting Eugene Weekly if you’re able. Every dollar helps keep us digging, questioning, celebrating — and yes, occasionally annoying exactly the right people. We consider that a public service.

Thank you for standing with us!